Airbus · Wide-body jet
Airbus A300
Is the Airbus A300 safe? It ranks Shared rankWithin 1 point of other aircraft types: the difference is not meaningful.More in the glossary of 53 airliner families we rate, with 6 fatal accidents counted in about 9.3 million passenger flights.
How the score is built
- Fatal passenger accidents
- 6 in 9.3 million flights
0.65 fatal passenger accidents per million flights. Counted: passenger flights, accidents and unexplained losses; not counted: sabotage, hijackings, shoot-downs and deliberate crew acts.
- Full-loss equivalents
- 5
Each counted accident adds the share of people on board who died (1 = no survivors). This is what the score is based on.
- Flights flown
- 9.3 million
Estimated passenger departures. Passenger departures 1974 to 7 October 2026. 2019-2022: OpenSky flights by passenger airlines, re-weighted to World Bank departures country by country. Other years: fleet model (deliveries with a median passenger service life of about 20 years, about 1,106 departures per aircraft per year, calibrated on OpenSky 2019). Uncertainty roughly ±25%.
- Technology generation
- Gen 3 jet (glass cockpit and flight management system)
Small fleets are pulled toward the record of their generation: 0.17 full-loss equivalents per million flights over 419 million flights. Weight of this family's own record: 76%.
- Last fatal passenger accident
- 12 November 2001
American Airlines flight AA587, Belle Harbor, NY, United States of America: 260 of 260 people on board died.
- Hull losses
- 39
Civil aircraft destroyed or written off from all causes, including non-fatal accidents, cargo flights and attacks; airframes flown by air forces on military operations are left out (context only, not in the score).
Compared with everyday risks
One flight on the Airbus A300 carries about the same risk of death as the activities near it below.
- An hour's walk1 in 14 million
- Driving 100 miles (160 km)1 in 5.9 million
- One flight on the Airbus A300This aircraft1 in 2.2 million
- A day of skiing1 in 1.3 million
- An ordinary day: accidents and violence1 in 1 million
- A scuba dive1 in 500,000
- Cycling 100 miles (160 km)1 in 430,000
- Running a marathon1 in 290,000
- A skydive1 in 250,000
- A general anaesthetic1 in 100,000
- Riding a motorbike 100 miles (160 km)1 in 83,000
Accident history
6 fatal accidents count toward the score, with 1,122 people on board killed.
| Date | Flight | Killed | What happened |
|---|---|---|---|
| American Airlines AA587A300B4-605R · Belle Harbor, NY, United States of America | 260 / 260 on board | Climbing out of JFK behind a 747, the A300 hit wake turbulence and the first officer made repeated full rudder reversals. The loads tore off the vertical tail, and the jet fell into a Queens neighbourhood, killing five people on the ground.Type: Loss of control in flightASN record | |
| American AirlinesA300B4-605R · Miami International Airport, FL (MIA/KMIA), United States of America | 1 / 133 on board | A pressurisation fault after takeoff led to a return to Miami. The crew skipped the checklists that would have depressurised the cabin, so when an evacuation was ordered the L1 door burst open and threw the purser to the ground. Loose insulation had blocked the outflow valves.Type: System failureASN record | |
| China Airlines CI676A300B4-622R · Taipei-Chiang Kai Shek International Airport (TPE), Taiwan | 196 / 196 on board | Arriving far too high, the crew went around over the threshold and did not counter the nose-up pitch from go-around thrust; the jet climbed steeply, stalled and crashed into houses beside the runway, also killing seven people on the ground.Type: Loss of control in flightASN record | |
| Garuda Indonesia AirwaysA300B4-220 · 25 km SSW of Medan-Polonia Airport (MES), Indonesia | 234 / 234 on board | Under radar vectors in forest-fire smog, a confused exchange with the controller over the turn direction distracted the crew, who descended below the assigned 2,000 ft and hit trees on high ground.Type: Flight into terrainASN record | |
| China AirlinesA300B4-622R · Nagoya-Komaki International Airport (NGO), Japan | 264 / 271 on board | On a night ILS approach the first officer accidentally triggered go-around mode and fought the autopilot, which trimmed the stabilizer fully nose-up. When the captain went around, the jet climbed steeply, stalled and crashed beside the runway.Type: Loss of control in flightASN record | |
| Pakistan International Airlines - PIA PK268A300B4-203 · 18 km S of Kathmandu-Tribhuvan Airport (KTM), Nepal | 167 / 167 on board | On the complex Sierra approach to Kathmandu in cloud, the crew reached each DME step one altitude level early and too low, and the jet hit a steep hillside. The approach's complexity and its chart were contributing factors.Type: Flight into terrainASN record |
Listed but not counted
These events did not happen on regular passenger flights or were caused by a crime or a deliberate act, which says little about the aircraft design.
| Date | Flight | Killed | Why not counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| United Parcel Service - UPSA300F4-622R · 1 km N of Birmingham-Shuttlesworth International Airport, AL (BHM), United States of America | 2 / 2 on board | Cargo flight. On a pre-dawn non-precision approach to Birmingham, the crew pressed on with an unstable approach without watching altitude, and the A300 sank below minimums into trees about 1 km short. FMC set-up errors, missed callouts and fatigue contributed.Type: Flight into terrainASN record | |
| AeroUnion - Aerotransporte de Carga UnionA300B4-203 (F) · 0,7 km S of Monterrey International Airport (MTY), Mexico | 5 / 5 on board | Cargo flight. Cargo flight that went around from a non-precision approach to Monterrey, then climbed steeply, lost speed, stalled and hit a road, also killing a motorist. Investigators cited poor crew coordination, an unstable approach and bad weather.Type: Loss of control in flightASN record | |
| Indian AirlinesA300B2-101 · Kandahar Airport (KDH), Afghanistan | 1 / 189 on board | Unlawful interference (sabotage, hijacking or shoot-down). Hijacking. Five armed men seized the flight to Delhi and forced it to Amritsar, Lahore, Dubai and finally Kandahar, killing one passenger. After a week, India freed three prisoners in exchange for the hostages.Type: SecurityASN record | |
| China Eastern Airlines MU5915A300 · Xiamen Airport (XMN), China | 1 / 195 on board | Unlawful interference (sabotage, hijacking or shoot-down). Hijacking. A passenger claimed to have a bomb and demanded to go to Taiwan; the flight carried on to Xiamen, where he was shot dead by security officers in a struggle on final approach. The jet landed safely.Type: SecurityASN record | |
| Air FranceA300B2-1C · Marseille-Provence Airport (MRS), France | 7 / 236 on board | Unlawful interference (sabotage, hijacking or shoot-down). Hijacking. Four GIA gunmen seized the Paris-bound jet at Algiers and, two days later, had it flown to Marseille, where French police stormed it. The four gunmen died, as did three passengers.Type: SecurityASN record | |
| Iran Air IR655A300B2-203 · 4 km SE off Qeshm Island, Iran | 290 / 290 on board | Unlawful interference (sabotage, hijacking or shoot-down). Climbing out of Bandar Abbas on a scheduled flight to Dubai, the A300 was shot down by missiles from the cruiser USS Vincennes, whose crew mistook it for an Iranian F-14. Radio challenges went unanswered and the wreck fell into the sea off Qeshm.Type: SecurityASN record | |
| EgyptAirA300B4-203 · Luxor Airport (LXR), Egypt | 5 / 5 on board | Training flight. On a training flight the A300 landed about 700 m down the runway at Luxor; its right main gear struck runway lights and it ran into an antenna and fences.Type: Runway excursionASN record | |
| Kuwait AirwaysA300C4-620 · Tehran-Mehrabad Airport (THR), Iran | 2 / 161 on board | Unlawful interference (sabotage, hijacking or shoot-down). Four armed men hijacked the flight after a stop in Dubai and forced it to Tehran, demanding the release of 17 prisoners held in Kuwait. Over six days they beat several hostages and killed two Americans before Iranian security forces overpowered them.Type: SecurityASN record | |
| Eastern Air LinesA300B · Miami International Airport, FL (MIA), United States of America | 1 / 148 on board | Unlawful interference (sabotage, hijacking or shoot-down). A man seized a flight attendant at the back of the cabin and set fire to a flammable liquid. Crew put the flames out with extinguishers, and with passengers' help subdued him; he died of asphyxia before the jet landed in Miami.Type: SecurityASN record |
The Airbus A300 was Europe's first widebody and the first twin-engined one anywhere. As a passenger aircraft its record is reasonable for its age: up to 7 October 2026 it has had 15 fatal events, but only 6 count, in about 9.3 million passenger flights. The other nine were cargo, training or deliberate attacks. Today you are unlikely to fly on one at all.
Where the A300 still carries passengers
The A300 first flew in 1972 and entered service in 1974. Airbus built 561 until 2007, in two broad versions: the original A300B2 and B4 with a flight engineer, and the A300-600 of the 1980s with a two-pilot glass cockpit. About 200 are still in service, almost all as freighters. FedEx, UPS and DHL's airlines are the big operators.
Passenger A300s are now a niche. Iran Air and Mahan Air still fly them, because US sanctions keep them from buying new aircraft or getting full manufacturer support. Thai Airways, Japan Airlines, China Airlines and American Airlines, once large users, retired theirs years ago.
Why cargo crashes do not count
Our score measures the risk to a passenger, so we count fatal accidents on passenger flights and divide by passenger flights. Freighters fly different hours, routes and loads, and the flight counts we use are for passenger service. Two fatal cargo crashes are therefore left out: an AeroUnion A300 at Monterrey in 2010 (5 dead) and UPS 1354, which hit terrain short of the runway at Birmingham, Alabama, on 14 August 2013 (both pilots died). An EgyptAir training flight at Luxor in 1987 is excluded too.
Six attacks are also excluded. The worst was Iran Air 655, shot down by a US Navy cruiser on 3 July 1988 with 290 dead; the others were hijackings and attacks on board between 1981 and 1999. Our methodology sets out the rules.
The six counted accidents
- 28 September 1992, PIA 268: on the complex approach to Kathmandu the crew stayed one step below the published altitudes and hit a hillside. All 167 died.
- 26 April 1994, China Airlines 140, Nagoya: the go-around mode was engaged by mistake on approach, the pilots fought the autopilot's pitch-up and the aircraft stalled. 264 of 271 died. A service bulletin that would have helped had not been fitted, and Airbus had not made it mandatory.
- 26 September 1997, Garuda 152: a confused left-right turn instruction near Medan, in smoke haze, and the A300 flew into trees. All 234 died.
- 16 February 1998, China Airlines 676, Taipei: high on approach, the crew went around and did not hold down the nose as thrust rose. It stalled; all 196 died, plus 7 on the ground.
- 20 November 2000, American Airlines, Miami: the crew landed without depressurising the cabin, and a flight attendant was killed when the door blew open. 1 of 133 died.
- 12 November 2001, American Airlines 587, New York: hard alternating rudder inputs in wake turbulence broke off the fin. All 260 died, plus 5 on the ground.
What changed
Both China Airlines crashes were go-arounds in which the A300-600 pitched up steeply as thrust and trim built up, and the crew did not counter it in time. At Nagoya the autopilot was trimming nose-up while the pilot pushed forward. Airbus changed the autopilot so that it disconnects when the pilot pushes hard on the controls. After flight 587, airlines changed how they train pilots to use the rudder at speed. The A300 is not Fly-by-wireA flight control system in which the pilot's inputs go to computers, which then move the control surfaces. Many such systems also stop unsafe manoeuvres.More in the glossary, unlike every later Airbus except the A310.
How to tell if you are on one
Flight trackers show A30B for the original A300B2 and B4, and A306 for the A300-600. In 2026 a passenger A300 almost always means an Iranian airline, and the airline's sanctions and maintenance situation matter more than the airframe.
Questions people ask
Can you still fly on an Airbus A300?
Rarely. About 200 of the 561 built remain in service, and almost all of them carry cargo for companies such as FedEx and UPS. Passenger A300s are now found mainly with Iran Air and Mahan Air, which keep old Airbus jets flying because sanctions block new ones.
Why did the tail come off American Airlines flight 587?
On 12 November 2001 the A300-600 climbed out of New York JFK into the wake of a Japan Airlines 747. The first officer pushed the rudder pedals hard from side to side, and the loads broke the fin off. All 260 people on board and 5 on the ground died. The NTSB blamed those inputs, and named the sensitive rudder design and American's pilot training as factors.
Was the Iran Air A300 shot down?
Yes. On 3 July 1988 a US Navy cruiser shot down Iran Air flight 655 over the Strait of Hormuz, and all 290 people on board died. It was an attack, not an accident, so it does not count in the aircraft's score.
Is the A300 the same as the A310?
The A310 is a shortened A300 with a new wing and a two-pilot cockpit from the start. The later A300-600 took over much of the A310's cockpit and systems. We score them as separate types.
Sources
- 1.ASN record: American Airlines flight 587, Belle Harbor, New York, 12 November 2001 (opens in a new tab) · Aviation Safety Network
- 2.ASN record: China Airlines flight 140, Nagoya, 26 April 1994 (opens in a new tab) · Aviation Safety Network
- 3.ASN record: China Airlines flight 676, Taipei, 16 February 1998 (opens in a new tab) · Aviation Safety Network
- 4.ASN record: Garuda Indonesia flight 152, near Medan, 26 September 1997 (opens in a new tab) · Aviation Safety Network
- 5.ASN record: UPS A300F4-622R, Birmingham, Alabama, 14 August 2013 (opens in a new tab) · Aviation Safety Network
- 6.SafetyScorer exposure model: OpenSky Network flights 2019-2022, World Bank departures, fleet model (opens in a new tab)Passenger departures 1974 to 7 October 2026. 2019-2022: OpenSky flights by passenger airlines, re-weighted to World Bank departures country by country. Other years: fleet model (deliveries with a median passenger service life of about 20 years, about 1,106 departures per aircraft per year, calibrated on OpenSky 2019). Uncertainty roughly ±25%.