ATR · Turboprop
ATR 42
Is the ATR 42 safe? It ranks #37 of 53 airliner families we rate, with 9 fatal accidents counted in about 6.3 million passenger flights.
How the score is built
- Fatal passenger accidents
- 9 in 6.3 million flights
1.4 fatal passenger accidents per million flights. Counted: passenger flights, accidents and unexplained losses; not counted: sabotage, hijackings, shoot-downs and deliberate crew acts.
- Full-loss equivalents
- 5.9
Each counted accident adds the share of people on board who died (1 = no survivors). This is what the score is based on.
- Flights flown
- 6.3 million
Estimated passenger departures. Passenger departures 1985 to 7 October 2026. 2019-2022: OpenSky flights by passenger airlines, re-weighted to World Bank departures country by country. Other years: fleet model (deliveries with a median passenger service life of about 21 years, about 773 departures per aircraft per year, calibrated on OpenSky 2022). Uncertainty roughly ±25%.
- Technology generation
- Modern turboprop (designed from the 1980s)
Small fleets are pulled toward the record of their generation: 0.92 full-loss equivalents per million flights over 80.3 million flights. Weight of this family's own record: 68%.
- Last fatal passenger accident
- 6 November 2022
Precision Air, off Bukoba Airport (BKZ), Tanzania: 19 of 43 people on board died.
- Hull losses
- 44
Civil aircraft destroyed or written off from all causes, including non-fatal accidents, cargo flights and attacks; airframes flown by air forces on military operations are left out (context only, not in the score).
Compared with everyday risks
One flight on the ATR 42 carries about the same risk of death as the activities near it below.
- An hour's walk1 in 14 million
- Driving 100 miles (160 km)1 in 5.9 million
- A day of skiing1 in 1.3 million
- One flight on the ATR 42This aircraft1 in 1.1 million
- An ordinary day: accidents and violence1 in 1 million
- A scuba dive1 in 500,000
- Cycling 100 miles (160 km)1 in 430,000
- Running a marathon1 in 290,000
- A skydive1 in 250,000
- A general anaesthetic1 in 100,000
- Riding a motorbike 100 miles (160 km)1 in 83,000
Accident history
9 fatal accidents count toward the score, with 246 people on board killed.
| Date | Flight | Killed | What happened |
|---|---|---|---|
| Precision AirATR 42-500 · off Bukoba Airport (BKZ), Tanzania | 19 / 43 on board | After circling in a sudden thunderstorm, the crew continued an approach to Bukoba below weather minima and the aircraft struck Lake Victoria short of the runway. Investigators cited an unstabilised approach, rain, gusts and no response to terrain warnings.Type: Flight into terrainASN record | |
| West Wind AviationATR 42-320 · 1,5 km W of Fond-du-Lac Airport, SK (ZFD), Canada | 1 / 25 on board | The aircraft left Fond-du-Lac with ice still on it from the inbound flight plus frost formed on the ground, as the strip lacked proper de-icing gear. Right after takeoff it rolled left, the crew lost roll control and it hit trees. One passenger died later in hospital.Type: IcingASN record | |
| Pakistan International Airlines - PIAATR 42-500 · 6,5 km SSE of Havelian, Pakistan | 47 / 47 on board | A fatigued turbine blade failed in the left engine, which was overdue for blade replacement, and its propeller would not feather and later ran away, creating heavy drag. The crew could not hold height or heading and the aircraft stalled into a hillside.Type: Engine failureASN record | |
| Trigana Air ServiceATR 42-300 · 16,7 km NW of Oksibil Airport (OKL), Indonesia | 54 / 54 on board | Approaching Oksibil, the crew left the standard approach guidance in mountainous terrain with poor visibility and flew into a ridge. No terrain warning sounded; the database lacked detailed local terrain and pilots at the airline sometimes pulled the warning breaker.Type: Flight into terrainASN record | |
| ConviasaATR 42-320 · 13 km SE of Puerto Ordaz Airport (PZO), Venezuela | 17 / 51 on board | On approach to Puerto Ordaz the aircraft crashed among industrial buildings some 8 km before runway 07. Investigators blamed a crew warning system that gave a false stall alert, plus poor crew coordination and handling of the controls.Type: System failureASN record | |
| Santa Bárbara AirlinesATR 42-300 · ca 10 km NW of Mérida-A Carnevalli Airport (MRD), Venezuela | 46 / 46 on board | The crew left Mérida in a hurry without letting the attitude and heading system initialise, then flew an unpublished departure into cloud using the magnetic compass. The aircraft turned toward high ground and struck a mountain at 3,810 m.Type: Flight into terrainASN record | |
| United Nations - UN, lsf SiFly KSV3275ATR 42-312 · 18 km NE of Mitrovica, Kosovo | 24 / 24 on board | Descending toward Pristina in poor visibility, the aircraft hit a hillside just below the summit while turning. Investigators blamed weak crew discipline, a military radar controller who lost track of the flight, operator pressures and an unusable GPWS.Type: Flight into terrainASN record | |
| Air LittoralATR 42-512 · Florence-Peretola Airport (FLR), Italy | 1 / 17 on board | On a training circling approach to the opposite runway, the crew arrived steep and fast and did not go around despite repeated GPWS warnings. The aircraft touched down long, ran off the end across grass and stopped in the fence beside the A11 motorway.Type: Runway excursionASN record | |
| Aero Trasporti Italiani - ATIATR 42-312 · Conca di Crezzo, Italy | 37 / 37 on board | Climbing in icing conditions about 15 minutes after leaving Milan-Linate, the aircraft began violent rolls and the crew lost control. Pitch-trim movements during the pull-up kept the nose down and it hit a mountainside.Type: Loss of control in flightASN record |
Listed but not counted
These events did not happen on regular passenger flights or were caused by a crime or a deliberate act, which says little about the aircraft design.
| Date | Flight | Killed | Why not counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nigerian Air Force - NAFATR 42-500 (512MP Surveyor) · near Igbokoda, Ilaje, Ondo State, Nigeria | 25 / 25 on board | Military operation. The air force maritime patrol ATR crashed into a mangrove swamp after witnesses saw it flying very low. The cause was not yet known.Type: Unknown causeASN record | |
| Indonesia Air, opb Mar. and Fisheries Res SurveillanceATR 42-512 · Mount Bulusaraung, Maros Regency, South Sulawesi, Indonesia | 10 / 10 on board | Not a scheduled passenger flight. On a fisheries patrol flight with a faulty GPS feed, the ATR ended up well off its expected position approaching Makassar. While being vectored onto the ILS it descended below safe altitude without a controller warning and hit a cliff on Mount Bulusaraung.Type: Flight into terrainASN record | |
| TOTAL Linhas AéreasATR 42-312 · 38 km S of Paranapanema, SP, Brazil | 2 / 2 on board | Cargo flight. Night mail flight whose autopilot disconnected with a runaway elevator trim. There was no checklist for it and the crew could not regain level flight; it dived into the ground. Investigators found a faulty relay had been passed by an incomplete test.Type: System failureASN record | |
| Air BotswanaATR 42-320 · Gaborone-Sir Seretse Khama International Airport (GBE), Botswana | 1 / 1 on board | Unlawful interference (sabotage, hijacking or shoot-down). Deliberate act. A grounded Air Botswana captain took off alone in a parked ATR, circled Gaborone for about two hours making demands by radio, then flew into the airline's two other ATRs on the apron.Type: SecurityASN record | |
| Royal Air Maroc - RAMATR 42-312 · near Tizounine, Morocco | 44 / 44 on board | Deliberate act by a crew member. The ATR 42 dived into the Atlas Mountains shortly after takeoff from Agadir; investigators found the captain did this deliberately. All 44 on board died.Type: SecurityASN record | |
| Ethiopian AirlinesATR 42-320 · Dire Dawa Airport (DIR), Ethiopia | 2 / 34 on board | Unlawful interference (sabotage, hijacking or shoot-down). Hijacking. Four people seized the flight and demanded to go to Djibouti; it landed at Dire Dawa to refuel. After six days security forces stormed it, killing two hijackers.Type: SecurityASN record |
The ATR 42 is a safe aircraft, but its record per flight is weaker than that of most airliners. The main reason is where it works: short runways in mountains, jungle, islands and the Arctic, often for small airlines. On a scheduled flight with an established carrier, the airframe is not the risk to worry about.
Where you fly on an ATR 42
The ATR 42 was the first aircraft from the Franco-Italian ATR venture. It first flew in 1984 and entered service in 1985. About 490 have been built and about 280 are in service, with roughly 48 seats each. It is the aircraft airlines choose when an ATR 72 is too big or the runway too short: Air Tahiti in French Polynesia, Canadian North in the Arctic, Air Saint-Pierre off Newfoundland, and many operators in Indonesia, Africa and Latin America. Many older ones now fly cargo.
ATR 42s fly fewer flights per year than most airliners, about 6.2 million passenger flights in total since 1985. A handful of crashes therefore weighs heavily on the record.
The fatal record
Our data lists 15 fatal events up to 7 October 2026. Nine count toward the score:
- 15 October 1987, ATI, near Como, Italy: lost control in icing while climbing out of Milan. All 37 died. Icing was a factor, years before the Roselawn crash on the ATR 72.
- 12 November 1999, SiFly (UN flight), Kosovo: flew into a mountain on approach to Pristina. All 24 died.
- 21 February 2008, Santa Bárbara Airlines, Mérida, Venezuela: flew into the Andes after take-off. All 46 died.
- 13 September 2010, Conviasa, Puerto Ordaz, Venezuela: 17 of 51 died.
- 16 August 2015, Trigana Air, Papua, Indonesia: flew into terrain on approach to Oksibil. All 54 died.
- 7 December 2016, PIA, Havelian, Pakistan: an engine failed in flight on the way from Chitral and the crew lost control. All 47 died.
- 6 November 2022, Precision Air, Bukoba: crashed into Lake Victoria on approach in bad weather. 19 of 43 died.
Two more accidents killed one person each (Florence 1997, Fond-du-Lac 2017).
Six events do not count. The 1994 Royal Air Maroc crash near Agadir, which killed all 44, was found to be a deliberate act by the captain. Two acts of unlawful interference, a 2002 cargo crash in Brazil and a January 2026 government surveillance flight in Sulawesi complete the list, with a Nigerian Air Force ATR 42 that crashed on 5 October 2026, killing all 25 on board, which was a military flight. Our methodology explains the rules.
Is it the aircraft or where it flies?
Look at the places: the Andes, Papua's highlands, the mountains of northern Pakistan and Kosovo, a lake shore in a storm. Most of the counted crashes involved mountains or bad weather, and several were on routes to airports no airliner jet uses, such as Oksibil, Chitral and Bukoba. These are the runways small turboprops are built for, often without precision approaches or radar, with fast-changing weather and with crews who rely on visual flying. Some operators on these routes, such as Trigana, were on the EU Air Safety ListThe European Commission's list of airlines banned or restricted from flying in EU airspace because they do not meet international safety standards.More in the glossary at the time.
The design has improved: the 42-500 and 42-600 have new engines, six-blade propellers and, on the 600, a glass cockpit. But a better cockpit does not make a mountain approach in cloud safe.
How to tell if you are on one
Flight trackers show AT43 (ATR 42-300), AT44 (42-320), AT45 (42-500) and AT46 (42-600). It looks like a shorter ATR 72, with a high wing and a door at the rear. If your route is remote, check whether the airline is on the EU Air Safety ListThe European Commission's list of airlines banned or restricted from flying in EU airspace because they do not meet international safety standards.More in the glossary and whether it flies in bad weather or waits; the answer tells you more than the type code.
Questions people ask
Is the ATR 42 a safe plane to fly on?
Yes, with a well-run airline. Most fatal ATR 42 crashes happened on mountain or jungle routes, in poor weather, often with operators under weak oversight. The airframe itself has no known unfixed design flaw.
What is the difference between the ATR 42 and ATR 72?
The ATR 42 is the shorter original, with about 48 seats against about 70 on the ATR 72. They share the cockpit, wing design and systems, and pilots can fly both with a common type rating.
Which ATR 42 crashed in Lake Victoria?
Precision Air's ATR 42-500 crashed into Lake Victoria on approach to Bukoba, Tanzania, on 6 November 2022, in bad weather. 19 of the 43 people on board died.
Does the ATR 42 have icing problems?
It shares the ATR 72's wing and was covered by the same de-icing changes after the 1994 Roselawn crash. In 2017, a West Wind Aviation ATR 42 crashed after take-off at Fond-du-Lac, Canada, and one passenger died; Canada's investigators found ice on the wings before departure.
Sources
- 1.ASN record: Trigana Air Service ATR 42-300, Oksibil, 16 August 2015 (opens in a new tab) · Aviation Safety Network
- 2.ASN record: PIA ATR 42-500, Havelian, 7 December 2016 (opens in a new tab) · Aviation Safety Network
- 3.ASN record: Precision Air ATR 42-500, Bukoba, 6 November 2022 (opens in a new tab) · Aviation Safety Network
- 4.ASN record: West Wind Aviation ATR 42-320, Fond-du-Lac, 13 December 2017 (opens in a new tab) · Aviation Safety Network
- 5.ASN record: Royal Air Maroc ATR 42-312, near Agadir, 21 August 1994 (opens in a new tab) · Aviation Safety Network
- 6.SafetyScorer exposure model: OpenSky Network flights 2019-2022, World Bank departures, fleet model (opens in a new tab)Passenger departures 1985 to 7 October 2026. 2019-2022: OpenSky flights by passenger airlines, re-weighted to World Bank departures country by country. Other years: fleet model (deliveries with a median passenger service life of about 21 years, about 773 departures per aircraft per year, calibrated on OpenSky 2022). Uncertainty roughly ±25%.